Microsoft using wetlands and native gardens to 'camouflage' 20-plus data center sites by blending them into nature — critics blast the 'biomimicry' effort as 'lipstick on a pig' amid a 20-year gas power deal | Tom's Hardware

Microsoft’s “biomimicry” program is reshaping the land around its data centers with restored wetlands and native gardens to help the buildings blend into local ecosystems at 20-plus sites, reports The Verge. Critics question the company’s motives after recent energy deals, such as a 20-year deal inked in June to buy power from a planned Chevron gas plant in West Texas. Public Citizen’s Texas director, Adrian Shelley, called the plan “basically lipstick on a pig.”

Microsoft says the approach is now part of all new projects in the U.S. The goal is to blend “data centers into the natural landscape” at sites across the United States and Germany, gauging community input and using ecological research to map the local environment. Microsoft’s team uses a tool called Ecosystem Intelligence, which runs on Azure and scores various features of the site, including water quality, biodiversity, and noise abatement.

Solutions, according to Microsoft’s director of global land strategy, Kaitlin Chuzi, are customized to the local habitat and should restore what was lost, while plant buffers quiet data center humming and help “minimize the visual impact on communities near our data centers.” Named sites include Mecklenburg County, Virginia; Mount Pleasant, Wisconsin; East Point, Georgia; Bedburg, Germany; and other projects in Ohio, North Carolina, and Wyoming.

The Mount Pleasant site, home to Fairwater, which Microsoft calls the “world’s most powerful AI data center,” has 100 acres of prairie and forest in a Lamparek Creek restoration with the Root-Pike Watershed Initiative Network. Its executive director, Dave Giordano, told the outlet that Microsoft developed its stormwater ponds with forebays to retain sediment, one of a number of accommodations for the environment. “Not all data center companies are the same,” he said. It is a living example of the company’s answer to AI data center backlash.

San Antonio District 6 Councilmember Ric Galvan told the outlet that there are more than a dozen data centers in his district, with more proposed. He cited concerns about the impact on traffic and the environment, including tree removal, following a 2022 approval of a Microsoft plan to remove 2,642 trees from a 33-acre tract for a data center.

• Microsoft-backed AI data center faces backlash over alleged unpermitted gas turbines and 1.5M-gallon LNG tank
• Protesters storm Microsoft AI data center construction site
• Amazon promises to spend $1 billion on communities close to its data centers, but critics push back

Microsoft spokesperson Jennifer Lyons, however, said in an email to the outlet that the company is investing in more than 400 acres of woodland and pollinator prairie restoration in San Antonio and intends to leave the “land more productive than we received it.” Galvan said Microsoft may be “covering their bases,” which he said is fine if residents’ concerns are addressed. He proposed a moratorium on new data centers in August, backed by Public Citizen, but the council opted against a blanket pause and is weighing zoning rules instead, with a vote scheduled for Oct. 15.

Shelley also pointed to adjacent effects, specifically pollution from new gas plants built to supply energy for data centers. “I cannot really see any level of biomimicry investment that makes a gas plant a desirable neighbor,” he told the outlet. Chevron says its plant would provide “approximately 2.67 gigawatts” of power if the plan goes through, with first power anticipated in 2028.

Meanwhile, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has paused approvals for data centers seeking to connect to the state’s main power grid until regulators audit them. In September, he barred the state’s environmental agency from issuing new data center permits until the audit is done. Water use, a common criticism, was only about 0.4% of the state’s total from data centers in 2025, according to the Houston Advanced Research Center (HARC). It projects water usage of 0.5% to 2.7% by 2030.

Emissions have risen by Microsoft’s own accounting, too. Its 2026 Environmental Sustainability Report, released in July, puts the total up 25% in fiscal 2025, “driven primarily by the expansion of our datacenter infrastructure” and by Microsoft pausing its use of unbundled renewable energy certificates, a type of accounting credit. Microsoft has 2030 goals of becoming carbon negative and water positive, meeting the latter in fiscal 2025 by its own measure.

Holly Alpine, who led ecosystem restoration and climate resilience work near Microsoft’s data centers until leaving in 2024, still sees a gap between data center buildouts and sustainability goals. Microsoft said in an email to the outlet that AI at a global scale must have “a range of energy solutions in the near term.”

Microsoft had no clear answer when questioned if it would ever change its mind on a site. Chuzi called it “an ongoing learning process to understand what that means to be a good neighbor.” HARC’s Erin Kinney told the outlet the real test is how Microsoft calculates, tracks, and shares the benefits with communities. Accurate measurement would make it easier to have genuine cooperation moving forward so that both data center companies and local communities can come together to mitigate environmental impacts.

Follow Tom’s Hardware on Google News, or add us as a preferred source, to get our latest news, analysis, & reviews in your feeds.